チェンライでテニス

冬の間、タイのチェンライでテニスを楽しむ日々を書き残す。時々、鹿児島のことも。

久しぶりにチェンライにいるロバートからメールが届きました。ニュージーランドが大変だというのです。

ニュージーランド首相、ジャシンダ・アーダーン(Jacinda Ardern)40歳が、コロナ陽性者とPCR検査拒否者を10月から収容所に隔離すると決めたようです。コロナ対策の優等生だったはずのニュージーランドなのになぜ! 

想像しすぎかな? ある日、全く元気な家族のもとに検疫官がやってきて、無理やりPCR検査をやり、陽性者だけでなく、検査を拒否する者を収容所に強制的に隔離するということのようです(ココ)。

擬陽性が多いPCR検査です。小さな子供が陽性と判定され、家族から切り離され、面会もできず、もし収容先で死亡すれば、そのまま荼毘に付されてしまう・・それを強制的にやろうというニュージーランド ?  恐ろしい ! 

Jacinda-Ardern
ロバート曰く「タイがニュージランドの真似をしないことを祈るよ」

いやいや、同じく「日本がニュージーランドの真似をしないことを祈ります」

インターネットの世界では「日本ではすでに集団免疫ができている」との声も聞こえます。もしニュージーランドと同じように日本でも同じことをすれば国民のかなりの数が(感染者ではなく)陽性者になり、無症状のまま収容所行きになります。そして経済ガタガタ、家族バラバラ。

日本でも欧米同様に別の要因で死亡してもコロナに感染していたら「コロナで死亡」したことにしろと厚労省のお達しが出ていたようですが、それでもコロナ死亡者は1500人程度です。年間で14000人ほど亡くなるインフルエンザと比較してずっと少なくトランプ大統領が言った「コロナは風邪だ」は正しかったようです。日本政府もGOTOキャンペーンで国民のコロナ脳を正常化して経済を元に戻そうとやっきです。

いまやみんなが恐れるのはコロナではなく、コロナ陽性が発覚すれば14日間の隔離で仕事も学業も止めなければならず、会社にも学校にも迷惑をかけ、社会的制裁を恐れているだけです。 早く時限立法である「法廷伝染病扱い」を解除して、国民の恐れを取り除いて欲しいと思います。



ところでニュージーランドでは国民を収容所に入れてどうしようというのでしょうか? 

恐らくニュージーランドに限らず全世界の人間にマイクロチップ入りのワクチンを注射するというのがDS(デイープ・ステイツ:闇の政府)の目的です。

コロナ禍の陰謀で言われるのはワクチンの中にマイクロチップを仕込み、そのマイクロチップは恐らくマイナーバー(ID)と連結し、携帯通信の5G電波を使って、マイクロチップに信号を送り、特定の人間をコントロール、いや生死さえも操ろうというものです。

私もそんな話を半ば信じ、半ば疑っていましたが、それを堂々と自社のホームページに掲載している企業があって驚きました。発表しているのは、PATIC TRUSTという甲府にある会社です。5G関連の製品開発をしている会社です。

その会社のトピックス(8月7日付け)として

新型コロナウィルス感染予防に向けた取り組み

ID2020: https://id2020.org/alliance

PATIC TRUST
(画面上↑ クリックで拡大)

このトッピクスを読むと、ワクチンにマイクロチップを仕込むという話は陰謀でもなんでもなく実行中の計画だったと言うわけです。企業が隠しもせずに堂々と「
プロジェクトの目的はRFIDマイクロチップを全ての人に埋め込み、国際的なデジタル認証システムを構築することである。」と 発表するとは思いもしませんでした。

少し前に書いた「トイレの水が止まらない①」の続きです。14年前の機種の補修部品があるか心配でしたが業者に連絡したらあるというので取り換えてもらい一件落着・・・とそうなるはずでしたが数日後にまた同じ現象が出ました。

どういう現象かと言うと、用を足したあとに「大」なり「小」なりのボタンを押して水を流すのですが、その水がいつまでも流れ続けるのです。その水の流れを止める方法は偶然発見したのですが、それはもう一度「大」か「小」のボタンを押すことなのです。

とは言え、どうして水が流れっぱなしになり、どうしてもう一度ボタンを押すとそれが解決するのかそのメカニズムがわかりません。それでは抜本的な対策はとれず対処療法だけです。

水が流れっぱなしになる現象は確率的には1週間に一度ぐらい。およそ100~150回に一回程度ですから業者に来てもらっても目の前で同じ現象が再現しないのです。

業者には、部品交換をしてもらったあとに2度来てもらい見てもらったのですが結局再現できず、さらに交換した部品以外はメーカーにも補修部品がなく、これ以上は「騙しだまし使う」か「新しいものを買う」しかないと言われました。

新しく機器に替えるとなると、10万円也の出費です。

しかたがない。これまでは業者任せで何とかなるだろうとただ見ているだけでしたが、業者が投げ出したので覚悟を決めて自分で原因を調べることにしました。

最初にまずトイレのフタを外して中の構造をチェックし「水の流れが止まらない」原因になりそうな部分を探しました。上からタンクの中を覗いたところ下の図のような構造になっています。(実際はもう少し複雑です)


フロート弁

メカニズムとしてはコントロールパネルの「大」か「小」ボタンを押すと「鎖」の上部に繋がっているレバーが回り、フロートが持ち上げられてフロート弁と間が空いて、そこから水が勢いよく流れ出し、その勢いでフロートはもっと上に持ちあげられ、タンクの水が少なくなるとフロートが元の位置に戻るという仕掛けです。

家族の協力を得て毎回用を足すたびに「水の流れが止まるか流れ続けるか」観察し続けた結果、三日目に、ついに「水が止まらない理由」が分かりました。その原因は上の図の赤丸の部分にあったのですが、そのことは業者用のメンテナンスマニュアルにもはっきりとは書かれていません。

赤丸のところだけに注目した鎖の動きを描いたのが下の図です。水が流れ出した瞬間に上に跳ね上がりますが、正常な場合には水がほとんど流れ出した後に元の位置に戻ります。
フロート弁1

ところが、赤丸の部分・・なぜかそこに凹みがあるのです、そこに偶然鎖が引っかかることがあるのです。なぜ数年間も引っかかることがなかったのに最近引っかかることになったのか、経年変化なのか、調整がまずかったのか不明ですが、観察を続けて3日目に偶然にも鎖が凹みに引っかかり元の位置に戻らない・・・つまり弁が開きっぱなしの状態を目撃することができました。レバーが元の位置に戻る勢いが強く、レバーに繋がっている鎖がタンクの中でピョンと踊ってたまに偶然に凹みに引っかかってしまうのです。
フロート弁2
(偶然、オレンジ色の球が凹みに引っかかり、元の位置に戻らず、弁が開きっぱなしになった)

これが原因であれば「水が流れっぱなし」の時にボタンをもう一度押すことで鎖が引っ張られ、引っかけられたのが外れて「水の流れが止まった」理由も理解できます。

一時は業者の言う通り機器を新しく買わなきゃいけない、それには10万円の出費が出ることを覚悟したものの、とりあえず凹みの部分をガムテープで塞ぎ応急処置をしました。

しかしながら分からないのは、なぜあの部分に鎖の玉が引っかかる凹みをつけなければいけなかったのか設計上の理由がわかりません。???

これで問題解決・・・そう思いたいところですが・・・どうやら期待は裏切られるもののようです。数日後またしても「水の流れっぱなし」が発生したのです。原因はレバーが戻らなくなったのです。(つづく)

(おまけ)
フロート(ゴム玉)の交換だけならアマゾンで1000円ほどで買えます(ココ)。交換の仕方はメンテナンスマニュアルを読めば自分でもできます。フロート(ゴム玉)には55mmと65mmサイズがあります。

一昨年の事ですが、私より少し年配のテニス仲間が庭木の手入れをやったり、家のエアコンを総取り換えしたり、家の手入れを忙しくやっていました。彼は元気そのものですが弱気な発言が目立つのでどこか具合の悪いところでもあるのかと心配していました。年齢的にはすでに後期高齢者。聞けば自分に万が一のことがあったら残された奥さんに負担がかかるので、なるだけ設備を新しくして自分が倒れたあとトラブルがあまり出ないようにしているのだといいます。終活というか、奥さん孝行です。


健康寿命

そんな彼ですが、やれることを全部やって心配事が片付いたためでしょうか? 今年はそれまでの弱きな発言がすっかり消え、これまで以上に元気になってプレイしています。 気懸りな事は早く済ませておくのが精神的によさそうです。

そんな彼に触発されたわけではない・・いややっぱり少しは影響されて、我が家でも台所のガスレンジを取り換えることにしました。我慢すれば騙しだましあと数年は使えたかもしれませんが、その頃には自分たちの体が動かなくなります。

ガスレンジの取り換えに合わせて、政府からコロナ対策で頂いた10万円x2=20万円でガスオーブンを追加しました。鹿児島に引っ越す前まで我が家にあったガスオーブンが9年ぶりに復活しました。
P9080047
オーブンの焼き初めは「鯛」。鹿児島のスーパーではコロナ禍で料亭・居酒屋に行くはずだった高級魚が行き場を失って安く売られています。おかげで今年は我が家の食卓にまで「鯛」が出ます。美味! 

正月が近づくと値段がぐ~んとあがる鯛ですが今は1000円もしません。食べるなら安く買える今の内です。
鯛
(写真の上でクリックすると拡大して値段が読めます。500~800円)

みんながスマホを持つ時代ですが3Gのガラケー携帯を使っています。検索やブログはPCを使いますから携帯で調べものをすることもなく、携帯そのものを持つ必要性があまりないのですが、一年半後に3Gを停止するというのでスマホに切り替えることにしました。指定の機種なら機種代が一括3300円というのに釣られました。

最近はスマホを購入すると安っぽいイヤホンが付属しています。面倒くさいから誰も使わないようですが、ガラケーにしろ、スマホにしろ強い電磁波が出て直接スマホを耳にあてて通話をすると脳腫瘍の原因になるのでイヤホンを付属している・・・というよりは脳腫瘍になった利用者から携帯会社が訴えられた時の責任逃れにイヤホンを付属しているのだと船瀬さんの本「ショック! やっぱりあぶない電磁波」に書いてありました。(レビュー欄も参考になりますから読んでください)
やっぱりあぶない電磁波
スマホをスピーカーホンとして使えば体から離して使うので電磁波の影響を受けませんが、それでなければイヤホンマイクで通話するのがよいようです。

男性であればスマホをズボンのポケットに入れていると前立腺がんのリスクが増し、女性が胸ポケットに入れておけば乳がんのリスクが高まるのだとか。

以前オランダ人の同僚が我が家に遊びに来たときに散歩中に高圧線の近くに民家があるのを見てびっくりしていましたが、オランダでは高圧線から70メートル以内に住宅を建ててはいけないと言っていました。ロシアでは70メートルではなく1Km以内は許可されません。

鹿児島市郊外には50万ボルトの高圧送電線が走っていて、変電所もあるのでグーグルマップで調べてみたら(ココ)、隣接して民家や事務所があって「大丈夫かな~」と心配になりました。
P9040034
(高圧線の真下では10ミリガウス〈mG〉を越えていました)

想像するに、はじめに高圧送電線や変電所が山の中に作られて、街が発展して民家が後から変電所の近くにやってきたのだろうと思います。 日本中どこにでもある風景です。

私は電磁波に鈍感なほうですがマリーは敏感です。ですから住まい探しには電磁波の影響が少ないことが一番の条件でした。高圧線が近くにないことはもちろんですが、テレビ塔(電波塔)から離れていること、携帯基地局が屋上や近くにないこと、
オール電化でないこと、変電設備から離れていること、窓の外側に電力会社のトランスがぶら下がっていないことなどなど・・日本は電磁波の規制がとんでもなく緩いので、街中の住宅でこれらの条件をクリアするのは大変です。

とは言え、今、住んでいる家が電磁波に強く被曝していたらどうするか?

家の中で電磁波測定をして10ミリガウス(mG)以上あったら、自分と家族の命と健康を守るためにすぐに引っ越しをすることだそうです。
P9030031
(3000円ほどで購入した電磁波測定器の測定範囲は30~300Hz。PCの電源部を測定したら画面が真っ赤になって6.8mGを表示してピーピーとアラーム音。5センチ離れれば影響なし)

船瀬さんの本には電磁波の問題が山ほど書かれてあってとても紹介できませんので是非図書館で借りてお読みになってください。お勧めです。

(おまけ)
東京高輪変電所
(東京高輪・高野山別院の地下にある東京電力の変電所。江戸城はオランダ人であるウイリアム・アダムス(三浦按人)、ヤン・ヨーステン(耶楊子)の提言に基づき中世ヨーロッパの城塞のノウハウで作られています。江戸城から神社・仏閣でカムフラージュした砲台まで地下道でつながっているのですが、その地下施設を利用したのが東京都区内にある地下変電所だと秋庭俊さんが語っています。どうやら国民には知られたくない話のようですが「森鴎外の「帝都地図」 隠された地下網の秘密」に詳しく書かれています。いまさら秘密にしておくほどのことでもないと思うのですが)

14年ほど使っているシャワートイレです。結構気に入っていますが時々トイレの水の切れが悪く、流した後にちょろちょろ流れ続け、このままだと水道代が高くなってしまうのではと気になって調べてみました。
DT-256
(図には手洗い鉢がついてますがINAX DT-256にはついていません)

取扱い説明書にはどうしたらよいかピッタリの項目はありませんが「ロータンクへの給水時間が長くなりはじめたら」ストレーナーの掃除をしなさいと書かれています。「ストレーナー」とは水道水のゴミや汚れを取り除くためのフィルターです。この「ストレーナー」にゴミが付着すると水の流れに影響が出るようなのです。二年に一度は掃除しなさいと書かれています。

「ストレーナーの汚れ」と「水の流れが止まらない」のメカニズムがよく分からないのですが、「ストレーナー」を掃除したら今のところ「水の流れが止まらない」現象が止んでいます。

そこで「ストレーナーの掃除の手順」、取扱説明書だけでは分かりにくかったところを自分なりに付け加えてメモに残します。

(1) 「ストレーナー」は「ロータンク用ストレーナー」と
    「シャワートイレ用ストレーナー」のふたつあります。似たものに
    「温水水抜き栓」があります。
ストレーナー
(2) まず、リモコンの「電源スイッチ」を押して「切」にし、本体の電源ランプが
    消えたことを確認します。
(3) 止水栓を閉めて給水を止めます。
止水栓
(3) サイドカバーを外す前に本体を浮上(リフトアップ)させます。
    便器両側にあるリフトアップロックレバーを手前に引き持ち上げると
    5センチほど浮上します。(カチッと音がして固定します)
リフトアップ

(4)サイドカバーを外します。
   これでストレーナーを取り外せます。
Cover
 
(5)ストレーナーの掃除
   ストレーナーについているゴミを水洗いして取り除きます。
ストレーナー1

(6) もとに戻す手順は省略します。


さて、ここまでストレーナーの掃除の仕方を散々書いてきて何ですが、掃除をした直後は水の流れっぱなしが一時止まったのですが、夕方になったら、また同じ現象がおきました。

やっぱりな~。ストレーナー(フィルター)の掃除で治るわけないな~と思ったものの、トイレのメカニズムは昔のものに比べて複雑になっているし、簡単には分解できません。

こうなったら専門家に頼むしかありません。でもメーカーに相談すれば「もう14年も過ぎてるのでそろそろ新しく買え・・」と言われるかもしれません。買い替えると20万円はします。

ハイテク製品もこういう時には困ります。昔のローテクタイプならホームセンターで部品を買ってきて自分でもなおせたのに!

そこで、9年前に自動食洗器を取り付けてもらった個人事業の方がトイレも扱っていたので連絡したところ、補修部品がまだあるというので見てもらいました。

経年変化とは言え、水位を調整する浮き(合成ゴム製)がドロドロで、手で触れるだけでゴムが手にべとっと付着します。これじゃ浮きの役目が果たせない?

部品取替え込みで13200円也で修理は終了しましたが、次に故障したらローテクなトイレに替えるつもりです。(つづく)

毎日見ている「花子のブログ」に新型コロナを利用して人類を虐殺しようとするシナリオが書かれてあって、これまで自分なりにそんなものかなと思っていたものの、実際に暴露されたものを読んでみるとまことに恐ろしい計画です。闇の勢力がジョージア・ガイドストーンに書いた人類の90%以上を抹殺し5億人以下にする計画がまさに2020年に始動したことがわかります。 



曝露されたシナリオが書かれたのは2010年6月のRF財団の54ページのレポート(英文)です(ココ

このレポートについてガーナのナナ・アクホ・アド大統領が動画で述べています。元の動画は削除されていますがコピーが残っています
 。訛りの強い英語です。(ココ

「花子のブログ」に書かれているシナリオを自分なりに整理しました。


(1)  非常に伝染性が高いが超低死亡率のウイルスを2008-13年に
     フォート・デトリック生物兵器研究所で作成
(2)  バックアップとして死亡率が高い兵器バージョンのウイルス
     を2015年フォート・デトリック生物兵器研究所でフェーズ3
     用に作成
(3)  カナダのウイニペグ国立微生物学ラボにウイルスを輸送し、
     故意に中国に盗ませる
(4)  パンデミック対応でファウチ、テドロス、WHO、CDC
     などに資金提供
(5)  ワクチン接種の検証認証プロトコル(デジタルID)を作成して
     資金提供しワクチン接種プログラムを実施
(6)  武漢ウイルス学研究所から生鮮市場にウイルスを撒き、それを
     非難する (2019年11月)
(7)  ヒトからヒトへの感染を可能な限り長く抑え、世界規模で広
     がる前に、どの国も初期の感染を防ぐためにロックダウン対
     応できるようにする。
(8)  ある国で感染が発生したら国境を封鎖するが、国内での感染
     は可能な限り拡大させる
(9)  国/地域の十分な人々が感染したら、その地域に強制検疫/隔離
     を実施し、時間の経過とともにロックダウン地域をゆっくりと
     拡大する。
(10) 死亡率を誇大宣伝。(誰かが何らかの理由で死亡し、新型コロ
     ナに感染または症状が似ていたら新型コロナでの死亡と見な
     す)→ 欧米で死者が多いのはこのため。 
(11) 地域経済を破壊し、市民の不安を引き起こし、サプライチェー
     ンを崩壊させ、大量の食糧不足を引き起こし、他の人々との接
     触を避ける(マスク・ソーシャルデスタンス)ことで免疫シス
     テムを弱体化させる。(注1)
(12) コロナの主な死亡原因は免疫暴走(サイトカインストーム)だ
     が、それを抑制する抗マラリア薬(ヒドロキシクロロキン)を
     軽視し、攻撃し、新型コロナと戦うためには「ワクチン」しか
     ないと繰り返し伝える。
(13) 検疫(PCR検査)を何度も繰り返し(2週間間隔で)引き延
     ばし、最終的にはより多くの人々が立ち上がって抗議/拒否す
     るようにする。
(14) 十分な公的な先送り(2020年6月まで)が得られたら、最終的
     にフェーズ1の検疫を終了し、隔離を終了するにはまだ「早す
     ぎる」と公に述べる。
(15) 公衆が「通常に戻る」まで数週間待ってから、死亡率の過大評
     価を続ける(2020年8月〜9月)。数か月間の隔離で人々の免
     疫システムが非常に弱くなっているため、死亡率をさらに水増
     しし、次のフェーズのロックダウンを宣伝する。(注2) 
(16) フェーズ2検疫(2020年10月〜11月まで)をさらに極端な
     レベルで制定し、「より大きな」第2波の原因を抗議者
    (ほとんどの場合、政府を信頼していない人々)のせいにする。
(17) フェーズ2の検疫をはるかに極端なレベルで実施し、反抗の罰
     金を増やし、すべての旅行を必須ではないと見なし、チェック
     ポイントを増やし、人々をアプリで追跡し、反抗する者へは買
     い物を制限しガス・水道の供給を止める。
(18) フェーズ2のロックダウンをより長い時間維持し、世界経済を
     破壊し続け、サプライチェーンをさらに悪化させ、食糧不足を
     さらに拡大する。
(19) 極端なアクション/力を使用して公の怒りを鎮静し、それらに
     逆らう人は誰でも公の敵#1とする。
(20) フェーズ2ロックダウン(6か月以上)の後、マイクロチップ
     入りのワクチン接種と接種認定をし、反対する者を敵として
     攻撃し、すべての人が接種するまでロックダウンを続ける。
(21) 大多数の人が従う場合には、それらの人々に新しいシステム
     を許可し、無視する少数派には制限を加える。
(22) 大多数の人が反対する場合は2015年にフォート・デトリック
     生物兵器研究所で作られた兵器化されたSARS / HIV / MERS
     株をフェーズ3としてリリースする。
     最終的な恐怖として30%死亡率のウイルスは、少数派(反対
     派)を急速に多数派に変える。 
(23) 新しいエコノミーモデル(Microsoft特許060606-身体活動デ
     ータを使用した暗号通貨システム)を制定します。
     基本的に私たち(闇の勢力)がやりたいことをやり、他の者
     は生き残るために必要なものへのアクセスを失います。

     ====

このまま行けば生きるも死ぬも「闇の勢力」の思いのまま、コロナ禍の先の「新世界秩序」では私もあなたも生きていませんが、残されるのは支配者層の奴隷(家畜)としての5億人・・若い人なら支配層への奉仕と内臓移植のスペア供給のためだけに生かされる・・動物以下ということになります。 


花子のブログ」をもう一度よく読んで、あなたがどのような選択をすべきか考えましょう。

40℃の炎天下、(偽)コロナを信じてのマスクで逆に免疫力が落ちます!


(注1)
泥んこ遊びをしたほうが病気しにくい子供が育つのは、泥の中のウイルスに曝露することで免疫力が育つからです。安保徹先生は一年に2度ぐらい風邪を引いたほうが免疫力が強くなるとおっしゃっていましたが、たまには病原菌と戦ったほうが免疫力が鍛えられます。

スポーツ選手も自主練習だけでは試合勘が鈍ります。やはり実践がないと勝負勘がなくなります。

同じようにマスクをし、ソーシャルデスタンスをとってばかりでウイルスの曝露を避けていればウイルスと戦う力が衰えます。闇の勢力はマスクとソーシャルデスタンスで人間の免疫力を弱らせ、そのあとに強いウイルスを撒こうという2段、3段構えのようです。

(注2)
コロナ死は日本では約1000人ですが、欧米では(10)にあるように極端に水増ししています。




タイのチェンライにいるロバートから「ベルリンで2万人デモがあったのを知ってるか?」とメールが届きました。(日本のマスコミは無視してますが)世界的に注目を集めたようです。

8月1日にベルリンで2万人、いやそれ以上の人々がコロナを理由にした国民の自由を縛る政策に反対する平和的なデモ行進をしました。

マスクをしているのは反対派と警官だけで、人々はソーシャルデスタンスも無視し、大きな声でシュプレヒコールを叫びながら行進しています。このデモ行進の様子はライブ配信されました。多くの人が政府がコロナを利用して国民の自由を縛り、マスクを強制し、奴隷化を進めようとしていることに気づきはじめた証拠です。

すでに65年間も使われて副作用のない抗マラリア薬のヒドラキシクロロキンが新型コロナの予防やサイトカインストームを防ぐ効果があることが分かってトランプも推奨していますが、陰の支配者たち(デイープステイツ)は自分たちでヒドラキシクロロキンを摂って防御しながら民衆には嘘の情報を流して、いかがわしい
(外部からコントロールできるマイクロチップ入り)ワクチン接種を強制しようとしています。

(注)日本人にとってはヒドラキシクロロキンがなくても海藻とか熱い緑茶(ココ)を摂っていればサイトカインストームを抑制することができます(ココ)。


(長編:ライブ配信録画)

動画が削除される恐れがあるので、ところどころをコピペして貼り付けます。
Berlin Demo 1
Berlin Demo 2
(コロナによる制限・監視をやめろ!)
Berlin Demo 3
Berlin Demo 4
Berlin Demo 5
(マスクの義務化ではなく「考えることの義務化!」)
Berlin Demo 6
(マスクをしてるのは反対派。小競り合いも)
Berlin Demo 7
Berlin Demo 8

Berlin Demo 10
Berlin Demo 11
(ひとりの女性が後ろ手に縛られて警官に連行される)
Berlin Demo 12
(警官を説得するデモ参加者)
Berlin Demo 9
(ひとりの警官が「懲戒」覚悟でデモ賛同のスピーチ)

マスク着用は空気の薄い高地に行った時に起こる低酸素症、血栓を作る恐れがありそうです。



30年も前のことです。ある休日、何気なく山手線を一周してみようと思い乗った列車はがらがらで、そこに偶然とはいえ目の前にNさんが座っていました。私が40歳前、Nさんは70歳近くだったと思います。Nさんとはいつも外国で会うことがあっても日本では会ったことがなかったのびっくりです。

電車に向かい合って座っていたNさんが、おもむろに着ていたTシャツを持ち上げて、体を鍛えているんだよとお腹をちらっと出したのですが見事な腹筋でした。ガラガラの電車だからできた出来事です。Nさんに比べて私の体調は最悪の時で階段を上り下りするにも息が切れるほどでしたが、その時はNさんを羨ましく思うだけで自分も体を鍛えようと前向きな気持ちにもならなかったのですが、事あるごとにその時のNさんとの出会いを思い出し、いつか自分もNさんのようになりたいとだけは思っていました。

いまの私はちょうどその時のNさんの年齢です。9年前に鹿児島に引っ越して一週間に3~4回テニスをするようになって体力がつき、仕事帰りの焼き鳥屋での一杯がなくなって体重も少しずつ落ち、いまではNさんに山手線で会った頃より10キロ近く減っています。

密かにNさんの生き方に共鳴していました。Nさんとは外国で2度、一緒に仕事をしています。一度はイラクのバグダッドで、2度目はヨルダンのアンマンです。

イランーイラク戦争中、私はイラクのバグダッドにおり、Nさんがエンジンの先生として派遣されることになっていました。Nさんは航空機の整備の仕事をしていたことがありエンジンの専門家でした。ところがお客さんと約束している日が近づいてもやって来る気配がありません。Nさんのリビアでの仕事が終わらず、仕方なくお客さんに訓練の日程を延期をしてもらいました。

それでもなかなかNさんはやってきません。日本からはNさんは帰国したが奥さんが病に倒れ看病していてすぐに来れないと言ってきます。再びお客さんに日程を延期してもらいました。2度も延期したのに、それでもNさんはやってきません。日本とのやりとりをテレックスでやっていた頃のことです。
IMG_0021
(バグダッド事務所の女性たち、彼女たちはキリスト教徒)

次に「奥さんを看病して過労でNさんが倒れた」とう言い訳には、これはどうやら作り話だと私も気づいたのですが、そんな作り話を黙って聞いてくれたイラクのお客さんには感謝です。

後にNさんに聞いた話ではどうやらイラクの敵国であるイランに仕事があったようなのです。それでイラク入国時に係官にパスポートをチェックされ「イランへの入国した記録があるが、イランで何をしてきた?」と聞かれ、Nさんは正直に「エンジンの訓練をしてきた」と答えると、係官が「それではイラクには何をしに来たか?」と聞かれ、Nさんすかさず「同じことを教えるために来た」と答えると、係官が「そうか、それならOK」と無事入国できたという話をしてくれました。

こういう場面でオドオドしてると係官から余計な疑いを持たれて面倒なことが起こります。Nさんのように腹が座ってるからできる問答です。

ヨルダンのアンマンは海抜800メートルぐらいの高地にあり、街が大仏の頭のように丘がたくさんあり、道路が細胞のようにぐにゃぐにゃと曲がって直線でないので覚えにくい地形です。そのアンマンにはじめてやってきたNさんは早速ホテルを出てどこかに出かけたのですが、後で聞けばホテルのカードを一枚もってバスにのって街の中を走り回って地形を頭に入れたのだそうです。ホテルカードがあるから分からなくなったらタクシーで帰れるからと話していました。難しい地形のアンマンで次の日からお客さんの事務所にタクシーを使って出かけていました。
死海1
(死海でラクダに乗る)

山手線の電車で会って以来、Nさんとは、その後会う機会はなかったのですがご存命であれば100歳を超えています。自分のお腹の腹筋を見ながら
密かな目標であったNさんのことを思い出しています。

今から5年後、2025年は団塊の世代がみんな後期高齢者になる年なんだとか。4人にひとりが後期高齢者になる日本。男性の健康寿命が72歳ちょっとで、平均寿命までの9年ほどをなんらかの制限つきの生活をするという統計データがあります。

統計データからみると私の健康寿命は終わっています。「用不用説(use and disuse theory)」というのがあって、使えば発達し、使わなければ退化するのが体と脳です。無料のテニスコートで汗を流し、図書館で本を借りて脳を動かし若い人に迷惑をかけないよう、介護のお世話にならないよう人生を楽しみたいと思います。 「もう年だから」といった言い訳は言いません。

健康寿命

介護保険料は掛け捨てに、80歳、90歳までテニスコートに立ち、薬に頼らず、子供の世話にもならずに生きていく・・そんな腹積もりです。「貯金」とお腹の脂肪は減らしても「貯筋」を増やす生き方を目指します。

11月3日の米国大統領選挙まで3ヶ月となりました。民主党のでっち上げ「ロシア疑惑」でトランプ政権の参謀をやめさせられたマイケル・プリンも復活(ココ)し、いよいよトランプの反撃がはじまりました。いまこそ民主党大統領候補バイデン、認知症気味で使い物になりそうもありませんが、一気に大統領への芽をつぶせるか期待がもてます。

それが8月4日、オハイオ州・クリーブランドとマイアミのOMG(Optima Management Group)の事務所へのFBIの捜査です。



OMGはウクライナのオルガリヒ、ウクライナで4番目に大きい人口100万人のドニエプロペトロフスクの前知事であったイゴール・コロモイスキーがオーナーで商業ビルなどを経営するコングロマリットです(ココ)。

コロモイスキーはユダヤ人っぽい名前というかユダヤ人です。

大統領候補のバイデンがオバマ政権で副大統領であった時に息子のハンター・バイデンをウクライナのガス会社の役員にしてもらい月収5万ドルを得ていて副大統領の立場を利用したワイロであろうとトランプから追及されていましたが、今回は同じウクライナ系のコロモイスキーが狙われたということはバイデンの新たなスキャンダルが暴かれるのでしょうか。



世界を驚かす爆発、8月5日の①べイルートでの小型核(?)を使った攻撃、②武漢郊外での高層ビルへの指向性エネルギー兵器での攻撃、③北朝鮮の中国国境での爆発は、FBIのOMG事務所襲撃、つまりバイデン・スキャンダルのニュースを隠すための陽動作戦だったという見方もされています。
hiroshimabeiruit
(広島原爆とそっくりなベイルートのキノコ雲)


(中国の高層ビルへの「指向性エネルギー兵器?」での攻撃。避雷針のある高層ビルへ雷が落ちることはない!)

トランプは小児性愛疑惑で欧州のロイヤルファミリーを含め追求の手を緩めていませんが、米国大統領選挙までの3ヶ月間、いろいろな事件が起こりそうな2020年です。(偽)コロナを恐れている場合ではありません。



交通事故で死んだ人を検査したら「コロナ陽性」だったので死亡原因を「新型コロナ」とした・・なんてことないんだろうね? 厚労省は外国を真似て同じような統計を取り出したようだ。

「トランプ氏、抗マラリア薬の使用を再び擁護 新型ウイルス治療に有効と」というBBCのニュース記事があります。




しっかりと議論を進めて明快に解説するのがBBCの流儀でしたのに、この記事はなんだかふにゃふにゃした記事です。マスコミは常に善意を装って議論を進めますが最後はトランプの言うことを否定して終わる傾向にあります。どうしてそうなるのか?

その背後には「マスコミを含む、小児性愛疑惑の渦中にあるデイープステイツ(DS)」とそれに対抗する「トランプ、Qanon」という構図があるからです。


トランプ大統領は抗マラリア薬のヒドロキシクロロキン
hydroxychloroquine 商品名:プラケニル)が新型コロナに有効で自分も14日間服用したが副作用がないと主張しました。

ヒドロキシクロロキンは安価な薬です。それをトランプ自身が服用してみせた。自分の体で試すトランプ・・偉い男じゃないですか。

それに対し、米国立アレルギー感染症研究所(NIAID)所長のアンソニー・ファウチ博士は28日、「ヒドロキシクロロキンはCOVID-19の適切な治療法ではない」と述べたとなっています。

「俺は専門家だぞ。大統領とはいえお前は素人じゃないか」というものでしょう。製薬業界とその飼い犬となったファウチにとってはヒドロキシクロロキンが新型コロナに有効という事実は何としても隠しておかなければならない事柄です。

ところが、

ファウチ博士こそ2005年にヒドロキシクロロキンをコロナの有効薬として承認した当人だったとしたらどうでしょう。
ヒドロクロロキンを承認したのはファウチ
(参考:https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

そんな馬鹿な?

この15年の間にファウチは巨大製薬会社に取り込まれて、自分が承認した薬を否定するまでになってしまったようです。

トランプが言うように安価なヒドロキシクロロキンで新型コロナが治療できるのであれば巨大製薬会社の儲けが吹き飛んでしまいます。それで1700万回も視聴された米国の医師たちの意見が述べられ動画が慌てて削除されました。YouTube、グーグル、フェイスブック、ツイッターとそろって削除しました。彼らはグルです。このあたりの経緯を詳細に(ココ)で説明していますから是非読んでください。 私が毎日チェックしているサイトです。 このブログを書いたのも、このサイトを見たからです。

さて動画の中でどんなことが述べられているのでしょうか?

削除された動画にこそ「真実」があると信じる私です。多くの人に知られたくない「真実」が何であるか知りたくなります。

その動画を(英文ですが)文字起こしされたページがありました。そのページも削除されてしまっては読めなくなってしまうので、そのままコピペしたのが下の英文です。45分間の議論の内容を翻訳する元気もありません。自動翻訳でもある程度まで理解できます。 読んでみて分かることは削除されなければならないような内容が何も含まれてないことです。

私が気になったポイントだけを書きます。他は英文の上で右クリックし「日本語翻訳」のタグを選択して読んでください。

(1) 02:03
    ボブ・ハミルトン博士(36年間小児科医)
    新型コロナに感染する子供たちは非常に少なく、感染しても入院
    する数は少なく、子供たちの死亡率は0.2%で、子供は感染し
    ても無症状で、子供たちから親や教師への感染もない。

(2) 05:27
    ステラ・イマヌエル博士
    ナイジェリアでヒドロキシクロロキンでマラリアの治療の経験が
    あり、Covid19でも350人以上の患者を治療した。糖尿病の患
    者さん、高血圧の患者さん、喘息の患者さん、お年寄り…最年長
    は92歳 すべて治療し元気である。誰も死んでいない。

    Covid19が「しゃっくり」の症状である。
ヒドロキシクロロキン
    で
「しゃっくり」は治る。

結論としては新型コロナはただの風邪、マスクも何も不要ということです。集まった医師たちの写真(下)でも誰もマスクをつけていません。ヒドロキシクロロキンは予防にも利きますが重い症状が出てから飲むべき薬です。

(注)
医薬品マフィアにとっては「ヒドロキシクロロキン」の有効性が一般に知られてはまずいの
ロックフェラーの息のかかったFDAをはじめとして、あらゆる手を使って邪魔しているようです。

米国ではレムデシベルでは3000ドル、ヒドロキシクロロキンでは10ドルの治療費がかかります。これまで65年間も使用された実績のある10ドルのヒドロキシクロロキンというコロナの予防にも治療にも有効な薬を使わせまいとする妨害行為です。

一方で新型コロナを仕掛けたファウチなどデープステイツの連中は予防薬として内密に
ヒドロキシクロロキンを摂っています。

帝京大学のサイト(ココ)では「非常に副作用の少ない薬で、重大な副作用は少ないです。」と紹介されています。 このサイトが消されたり改竄される前に読んでおきましょう。
 

世界のヒドロキシクロロキン(HCQ)の70%を生産するインドでは新型コロナの治療薬としてだけでなく予防薬として使用することを決めています。

    
(注)
新型コロナで免疫暴走(サイトカインストーム)が起こって重症化するのを防ぐためにヒドラキシクロロキンが使用できますが日本人なら同じ効果を海藻を食べたり熱い緑茶を飲むことで得られます。


  ==全文==


Jul 27, 2020 America’s Frontline Doctors SCOTUS Press Conference Transcript
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/americas-frontline-doctors-scotus-press-conference-transcript

America’s Frontline Doctors
A group of American doctors calling themselves “America’s Frontline Doctors” held a press conference on COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, and more outside the Supreme Court of the United States. Read the transcript of their press conference here.

Congressman Norman: (00:00) … I’ll turn it over.

Simone Gold: (00:01)
Thank you. Thank you so much congressmen. So we’re here because we feel as though the American people have not heard from all the expertise that’s out there all across our country. We do have some experts speaking, but there’s lots and lots of experts across the country.

So some of us decided to get together. We’re America’s Frontline Doctors. We’re here only to help American patients and the American nation heal. We have a lot of information to share. Americans are riveted and captured by fear at the moment. We are not held down by the virus as much as we’re being held down by the spider web of fear.

That spiderweb is all around us and it’s constricting us and it’s draining the lifeblood of the American people, American society, and American economy.

Simone Gold: (00:53)
This does not make sense. COVID-19 is a virus that exists in essentially two phases. There’s the early phase disease, and there’s the late phase disease. In the early phase either before you get the virus or early, when you’ve gotten the virus, if you’ve gotten the virus, there’s treatment. That’s what we’re here to tell you. We’re going to talk about that this afternoon. You can find it on America’s Frontline Doctors, there’s many other sites that are streaming it live on Facebook. But we implore you to hear this because this message has been silenced. There are many thousands of physicians who have been silenced for telling the American people the good news about the situation, that we can manage the virus carefully and intelligently, but we cannot live with this spider web of fear that’s constricting our country.

Simone Gold: (01:45)
So we’re going to hear now from various positions. Some are going to talk to you about what the lockdown has done to young, to older, to businesses, to the economy, and how we can get ourselves out of the cycle of fear. Dr. Hamilton.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (02:03)
Thank you, Simone. And thank you all for being here today. I’m Dr. Bob Hamilton. I’m a pediatrician from Santa Monica, California. I’ve been in private practice there for 36 years. And today I have good news for you. The good news is the children as a general rule are taking this virus very, very well. Few are getting infected. Those who are getting infected are being hospitalized in low numbers. And fortunately the mortality rate of children is about one fifth of 1%. So kids are tolerating the infection very frequently, but are actually asymptomatic.

I also want to say that children are not the drivers of this pandemic. People were worried about, initially, if children were going to actually be the ones to push the infection along. The very opposite is happening. Kids are tolerating it very well, they’re not passing it on to their parents, they’re not passing it onto their teachers. Dr. Mark Woolhouse from Scotland, who is a pediatric infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist said the following.

He said, “There has not been one documented case of COVID being transferred from a student to a teacher in the world.” In the world. I think that is important that all of us who are here today realize that our kids are not really the ones who are driving the infection. It is being driven by older individuals. And yes, we can send the kids back to school I think without fear. And this is the big issue right now, as Congressman Norman alluded to, this is the really important thing we need to do. We need to normalize the lives of our children.

How do we do that? We do that by getting them back in the classroom. And the good news is they’re not driving this infection at all. Yes, we can use security measures. Yes, we can be careful. I’m all for that. We all are. But I think the important thing is we need to not act out of fear. We need to act out of science. We need to do it. We need to get it done.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (04:07)
Finally, the barrier, and I hate to say this, but the barrier to getting our kids back in school is not going to be the science, it’s going to be the national unions, the teachers union, the National Education Association, other groups who are going to demand money. And listen, I think that it’s fine to give people money for PPE and different things in the classroom. But some of their demands are really ridiculous. They’re talking about, where I’m from in California, the UTLA, which is United Teachers Union of Los Angeles, is demanding that we defund the police. What does that have to do with education? They’re demanding that they stop or they shut all private charter schools, privately funded charter schools. These are the schools that are actually getting the kids educated.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (04:59)
So clearly there are going to be barriers. The barriers will not be science. There will not be barriers for the sake of the children. That’s going to be for the sake of the adults, the teachers, and everybody else, and for the union. So that’s where we need to focus our efforts and fight back. So thank you all for being here and let’s get our kids back in school.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (05:27)
Hello, I’m Dr. Stella Immanuel. I’m a primary care physician in Houston, Texas. I actually went to medical school in West Africa, Nigeria, where I took care of malaria patients, treated them with hydroxychloroquine and stuff like that. So I’m actually used to these medications. I’m here because I have personally treated over 350 patients with COVID. Patients that have diabetes, patients that have high blood pressure, patients that have asthma, old people … I think my oldest patient is 92 … 87 year olds. And the result has been the same. I put them on hydroxychloroquine, I put them on zinc, I put them on Zithromax, and they’re all well.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (06:12)
For the past few months, after taking care of over 350 patients, we’ve not lost one. Not a diabetic, not a somebody with high blood pressure, not somebody who asthma, not an old person. We’ve not lost one patient. And on top of that, I’ve put myself, my staff, and many doctors that I know on hydroxychloroquine for prevention, because by the very mechanism of action, it works early and as a prophylaxis. We see patients, 10 to 15 COVID patients, everyday. We give them breathing treatments. We only wear surgical mask. None of us has gotten sick. It works.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (06:46)
So right now, I came here to Washington DC to say, America, nobody needs to die. The study that made me start using hydroxychloroquine was a study that they did under the NIH in 2005 that say it works. Recently, I was doing some research about a patient that had hiccups and I found out that they even did a recent study in the NIH, which is our National Institute … that is the National … NIH, what? National Institute of Health. They actually had a study and go look it up. Type hiccups and COVID, you will see it. They treated a patient that had hiccups with hydroxychloroquine and it proved that hiccups is a symptom of COVID. So if the NIH knows that treating the patient would hydroxychloroquine proves that hiccup is a symptom of COVID, then they definitely know the hydroxychloroquine works.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (07:42)
I’m upset. Why I’m upset is that I see people that cannot breathe. I see parents walk in, I see diabetic sit in my office knowing that this is a death sentence and they can’t breathe. And I hug them and I tell them, “It’s going to be okay. You’re going to live.” And we treat them and they leave. None has died. So if some fake science, some person sponsored by all these fake pharma companies comes out say, “We’ve done studies and they found out that it doesn’t work.” I can tell you categorically it’s fixed science. I want to know who is sponsoring that study. I want to know who is behind it because there is no way I can treat 350 patients and counting and nobody is dead and they all did better.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (08:21)
I know you’re going to tell me that you treated 20 people, 40 people, and it didn’t work. I’m a true testimony. So I came here to Washington DC to tell America nobody needs to get sick. This virus has a cure. It is called hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax. I know you people want to talk about a mask. Hello? You don’t need mask. There is a cure. I know they don’t want to open schools. No, you don’t need people to be locked down. There is prevention and there is a cure.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (08:48)
And let me tell you something, all you fake doctors out there that tell me, “Yeah. I want a double blinded study.” I just tell you, quit sounding like a computer, double blinded, double blinded. I don’t know whether your chips are malfunctioning, but I’m a real doctor. I have radiologists, we have plastic surgeons, we have neurosurgeons, like Sanjay Gupta saying, “Yeah, it doesn’t work and it causes heart disease.” Let me ask you Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Hear me. Have you ever seen a COVID patient? Have you ever treated anybody with hydroxychloroquine and they died from heart disease? When you do, come and talk to me because I sit down in my clinic every day and I see these patients walk in everyday scared to death. I see people driving two, three hours to my clinic because some ER doctor is scared of the Texas board or they’re scared of something, and they will not prescribe medication to these people.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (09:35)
I tell all of you doctors that are sitting down and watching Americans die. You’re like the good Nazi … the good one, the good Germans that watched Jews get killed and you did not speak up. If they come after me, they threaten me. They’ve threatened to … I mean, I’ve gotten all kinds of threats. Or they’re going to report me to the bots. I say, you know what? I don’t care. I’m not going to let Americans die. And if this is the hill where I get nailed on, I will get nailed on it. I don’t care. You can report me to the bots, you can kill me, you can do whatever, but I’m not going to let Americans die.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (10:09)
And today I’m here to say it, that America, there is a cure for COVID. All this foolishness does not need to happen. There is a cure for COVID. There is a cure for COVID is called hydroxychloroquine. It’s called zinc. It’s called Zithromax. And it is time for the grassroots to wake up and say, “No, we’re not going to take this any longer. We’re not going to die.” Because let me tell you something, when somebody is dead, they are dead. They’re not coming back tomorrow to have an argument. They are not come back tomorrow to discuss the double blinded study and the data. All of you doctors that are waiting for data, if six months down the line you actually found out that this data shows that this medication works, how about your patients that have died? You want a double blinded study where people are dying? It’s unethical. So guys, we don’t need to die. There is a cure for COVID.

Simone Gold: (11:02)
My gosh. Dr. Immanuelle also known as warrior. Before I introduce the next guest, I just want to say that I wish all doctors that are listening to this bring that kind of passion to their patients. And the study that Dr. Immanuel was referring to is in Virology, which talks about a SARS viral epidemic that affects the lungs that came from China. And they didn’t know what would work. The study showed that chloroquine would work. It sounds exactly like it could have been written three months ago, but in fact, that’s study in Virology, which was published by the NIH, the National Institute of Health when Dr. Anthony Fauci was the director. Again, the official publication of the NIH, Virology, 15 years ago showed that chloroquine … we use hydroxychloroquine, it’s the same … little safer … works. They proved this 15 years ago when we got this novel coronavirus, which is not that novel, it’s 78% similar to the prior-

Simone Gold: (12:03)
… coronavirus, which is not that novel. It’s 78% similar to the prior version. The COV-1, not surprisingly. It works. I’m now going to introduce our next speaker. Sorry. I forgot to say your name. Sorry.

Dr. Dan Erickson: (12:12)
That’s all right. Dr. Dan Erickson, Dr. Gold asked me to talk about the lockdown, how effective they were and do that cause anything nonfinancial? They always talk about the financial, but you have to realize that lockdown, we haven’t taken a $21 trillion economy and locked it down. So when you lock it down, it causes public health issues. Our suicide hotlines are up 600%, our spousal abuse. Different areas of alcoholism are all on the rise. These are public health problems from a financial lockdown. So we have to be clear on that fact that there is, it’s not like you just lock it down and have consequences to people’s jobs. They also have consequences, health consequences at home. So we’re talking about having a little more of a measured approach, a consistent approach. If we have another spike coming in cold and flu season, let’s do something that’s sustainable.

Dr. Dan Erickson: (13:13)
What’s sustainable. Well we can socially distance and wear some masks, but we can also open the schools and open businesses. So this measured approach I’m talking about, isn’t made up, it’s going on in Sweden and their deaths are about 564 per million. UK, full lockdown, 600 deaths per million. So we’re seeing that the lockdown aren’t decreasing significantly, the amount of deaths per million. Some of their Nordic neighbors have less deaths for a variety of reasons, I don’t have time to go into today.

So what, my quick message here in a minute or two is just that we need to take an approach that’s sustainable. A sustainable approach is slowing things down, opening up schools, opening up businesses. And then we can allow the people to have their independence and their personal responsibility to choose to wear masks and socially distance, as opposed to putting edicts on them, kind of controlling them. Let’s empower them with data and let them study what other countries have done and make their own decision. That’s what I’d like to share. Thank you.

Speaker 1: (14:28)
Are there any questions?

Simone Gold: (14:29)
Are there any questions?

Speaker 2: (14:32)
You guys, we’re so excited I’m from South Dakota? You might have heard.

Simone Gold: (14:36)
Yes.

Speaker 2: (14:38)
I’m so glad you guys are preaching this message.

Simone Gold: (14:39)
You know, South Dakota did something interesting. It’s interesting that you’re from there. So the governor did not restrict access to hydroxychloroquine.

Speaker 2: (14:46)
We know. [crosstalk 00:02:48].

Simone Gold: (14:49)
Right. And you were, I believe you were the only state in the union that did that. And there’s been studies out there that attempt to show that it doesn’t work. They’re inaccurate because they’re given at the time, the wrong dose, the wrong patient either too much or a long time. So South Dakota did better because it had access to hydroxychloroquine. Thank you so much.

Speaker 3: (15:06)
Okay. So if someone we love does get sick with COVID and you said the word hydro, or however you say it, it’s restricted. How do we get access to that?

Simone Gold: (15:16)
Yeah. That’s the number one question we’re all asked every day. I want you to know that you’re not alone. I’ve had many congressmen ask me, how can I get it? So the congressmen can’t get it, it’s tough luck for the average American Joe getting it. It’s very difficult. You have to overcome a few hurdles. Your doctor has to have read the science with a critical eye and have eliminated the junk science. Many studies have been retracted as you know, and number two, the pharmacist has to not restrict it. Many states have empowered their pharmacists to not honor physician prescription. That’s never happened before. That interferes with the doctor patient relationship where the patient talks to the doctor, honestly, and the doctor answers the patient honestly has been violated.

Simone Gold: (15:55)
So you have a very difficult time as the average American. Some of the information we’ll share later this afternoon is to show the mortality rates in countries where it’s not restricted and the mortality rates where it is restricted. So I have friends all over the world now because of this. And in Indonesia, you can just buy it over the counter. It’s in the vitamin section. And I’m here to tell the American people that you could buy it over the counter in Iran. Because the leaders in Iran, the mullahs in Iran, think that they should have more freedom than Americans. I have a problem with that. My colleagues have problems with that. We don’t like to watch patients die.

Julie: (16:26)
So when people have problems, they should be picking up the phone, they should be calling their state and their federal representatives and senators and say, we are the American people.

Speaker 1: (16:42)
Let me say one thing [crosstalk 00:16:46].

Julie: (16:45)
You guys, we need the public to be.

Speaker 1: (16:49)
Thank you. Thank you, Julie. That is exactly right. If you hear what you’re, when you hear this, if you’re concerned and wondering why you may not be able to get access to it, we need to make four calls, call your governor, call both of your senators and call your Congressman and tell them that you want to know why you’re not able to get access to a drug that doctors are telling you will help end this and help us reduce the number of hospitalizations and reduce the number of deaths. Urge them to read Dr. Harvey Rich’s study from Yale. He’s a Yale professor of epidemiology. And from there you’ll find other studies.

Speaker 4: (17:31)
Yes. I wanted to ask how do people trust the data that they are looking at every day? The numbers are so variable when you go to Johns Hopkins, CDC, which divides COVID deaths in different categories related to pneumonia, other things where we get the right information to make sense?

Simone Gold: (17:52)
So the only number that I think is worth paying any attention to, and even that number is not so helpful is mortality because that’s a hard and fast number. So the case number is almost irrelevant. And that’s because there’s a lot of inaccuracies with the testing. And also even if the test is accurate, most people are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. So it’s not that important to know. So the case number, which you see rising all the time in the news is basically irrelevant. And if you had told us a few months ago, that that was the number that the media was going to go crazy over, we all would have just laughed at that. I mean, that’s essentially herd immunity. There’s lots of people out there who have tested positive without symptoms or with very mild symptoms. So the only number that’s worth paying attention to is mortality.

Simone Gold: (18:33)
When you look at the mortality, this is a disease that takes, that unfortunately kills our most frail members of society. People with multiple comorbid conditions, specifically diabetes, obesity is a big one. We don’t talk about that, but it is. It’s a fact. Coronary artery disease, severe coronary artery disease, people like that. And also if you’re older, it’s a risk factor. But the biggest risk factor is if you have comorbid conditions. If you’re young and healthy, this is not … You’re going to recover. If you’re under 60 with no comorbid conditions, it’s less deadly than influenza. This seems to come as great news to Americans because this is not what you’re being told. I would say the answer is it’s very difficult to get accurate numbers.

Speaker 5: (19:13)
This is [inaudible 00:19:13] of Breitbart News, if you had a message to Dr. Anthony Fauci, what would you say to him?

Speaker 1: (19:18)
Listen to the doctors. [inaudible 00:19:21] the frontline doctors. Have a meeting with the frontline doctors, and maybe I need to say that into the microphone. My message to Dr. Anthony Fauci is to have a meeting with these frontline doctors who are seeing real patients. They’re touching human skin. They’re looking people in the eye, they’re diagnosing them and they’re helping them beat the virus. They’re the ones who are talking to the patients, have meetings with them and do it every single day and find out what they are learning about the virus firsthand. And this is, and it’s important to understand, we have doctors here who are not emergency room doctors. They’re preventing patients from even hitting the emergency room. So if they’re only listening to emergency room or ICU at the very tragic end of a person’s life they’re not getting the full story. They need to come back in here the earlier portion. And they also need to understand what the lockdown and the fears are doing to patients around this country, because there are a lot of unintended consequences, which the doctors can speak about.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (20:30)
Can I say something. My message to Dr. Anthony Fauci is when is the last time you put a stethoscope on a patient? That when you start seeing patients like we see on a daily basis, you will understand the frustration that we feel. You need to start feeling for American people like we, the frontline doctors, feel. I need to start realizing that. They are listening to you. And if they are going to you, you got to give them a message of hope. Got to give them a message that goes with what you already know that hydroxychloroquine works.

Speaker 6: (21:06)
I have a question for Dr. Warrior.

Simone Gold: (21:09)
Dr. Immanuel.

Speaker 6: (21:10)
Dr. Immanuel, okay. You mentioned before some remarkable results that you’ve had treating your own patients. She said, I believe she said 300 patients.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (21:17)
Yes. Yes.

Speaker 6: (21:19)
Have you been able to publish your findings and results [inaudible 00:00:21:22].

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (21:22)
We’re working on publishing it right now. We’re working on that, but this is what I’ll say. People like Dr. Samuel [inaudible 00:21:29] published the data. And my question is, and? That will make you see patients. There’s no data around the world. Yes. My data will come out. When that comes out. That’s great. But right now people are dying. So my data is not important for you to see patients. I’m saying that to my colleagues out there that talk about data, data, data.

Speaker 6: (21:44)
If I can ask just one more question.

Simone Gold: (21:46)
May I just interject. There is a lot of [crosstalk 00:21:49] data on this. Not every clinician needs to publish their data to be taken seriously. The media has not covered it. There is a ton. I’ve got a compendium on americasfrontlinedoctors.com, there is a compendium of all the studies that work with hydroxychloroquine. The mortality rate was published in Detroit, less than a … It was July 4th weekend. They published it. Mortality by half in the critically ill patients, the patients who are get it early, it’s been estimated that one half to three quarters of those patients, wouldn’t be dead. We’re talking 70,000 to 105 … 70 to 100,000 patients would still be alive if we followed this policy. There’s plenty of published data. [crosstalk 00:22:27].

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (22:26)
Even with Dr. Rich. Dr. Rich published data recently. So there’s a lot of data out there. They don’t need mine to make those decisions.

Speaker 6: (22:34)
If I can ask one more question. There was a little girl who just a few days ago [inaudible 00:22:37] otherwise healthy and it was concluded that she died of COVID-19 so I was curious from your perspective, you feel that this little girl possibly died from some other condition and it was attributed to COVID-19 or is there some other reason why she [crosstalk 00:00:22:52].

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (22:52)
I will not. I will not be able to say that till I look at the little girl’s history and whatever happened. I know I’ve taken care of a lot of family members and I see a lot of children and they usually get mild symptoms, but I cannot talk about kids that I have not looked at.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (23:07)
What was the age of the child again?

Speaker 6: (23:10)
She was nine years old.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (23:10)
Okay. So listen, there are children who are dying of this infection. And the reality is that when they do die, they seem to have comorbidities. Really, you have to kind of look at each individual case. Uniquely there have been a little over 30 patients in the entire country, in the age category of 15 and below who have died of COVID. Frequently they do have comorbidities like heart disease. They have asthma, they have other pulmonary issues. So I don’t know, we don’t know the answer to this nine year old girl, tragically. She passed, and she’s no longer with us, but there’s probably, if you dig into it, there’s probably a story behind it.

Speaker 1: (23:48)
Dr. Hamilton, have you seen any patients who are having adverse side effects because schools have been closed, who have depression or suicide?

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (23:54)
I mean, I think that it is common knowledge that with the schools not being open, when you think about what your experience in junior high and high school-

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (24:03)
… not being open. When you think about your experience in junior high and high school, what do you think about? You think about parties and you think about football games, socializing. Those are the things we think about. Those are all being shut down, folks. Nobody is having fun anymore. And I will tell you that these are critical years of life to be out mixing with other kids, other people, and that has been shut down. So yes, there are lots of comorbidities that go along with shutting down. We’re talking about anxiety, we’re talking about depression, loneliness, abuse is happening, and kids who have particular… Children who have special needs, kids are not doing well either. So, there is a long list of complications that occur when you quarantine and lockdown people.

Speaker 7: (24:48)
So an extension to what you were just talking about, we hear all these studies and all this polling that moms are afraid to go back to work because of letting their children go to school, they shouldn’t go to school because then they’re exposed, and if the moms go back to school, then the elderly grandparents, they’re [crosstalk 00:25:04].

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (25:04)

Speaker 7: (25:06)
Can you speak to that please?

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (25:07)
Sure. Yeah, this is a big issue because people are afraid not that their children are going to get particularly ill, because I think they’re learning the truth is that this infection is being tolerated well by children. But certainly, they look at their environment, their particular unique family, and I think in some situations that may be an appropriate fear. However, I do think that as a general comment, a general rule through the country, kids can go back to school. Maybe a few kids here and there, their living situation, who they’re being cared for, that can be a potential problem. But again, for younger children in particular, they’re not the ones passing on the disease to the adults.

Speaker 7: (25:52)
Wouldn’t the hydroxychloroquine be…

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (25:52)
I’ll talk about that.

Speaker 7: (25:52)
Maybe Dr. Immanuel can speak to that, or somebody else.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (25:53)
Well hydroxychloroquine, yeah. [crosstalk 00:25:56].

Speaker 7: (25:53)
In terms of as a prophylaxis.

Dr. Bob Hamilton: (25:53)
That can be done. Yes, that can be used. [crosstalk 00:26:06]

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (26:06)
We’re talking about, we can’t open our businesses. We can’t go to school and parents are scared to get treated. And I personally, have put over a hundred people on hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis. Doctors, teachers, people who are health care workers, my staff, me, I see over 15 to 20, sometimes 20, 15, 10 patients a day. I use a surgical mask. I’ve not been infected. Nobody I know has been infected that’s around me. So this is the answer to this question. You want to open schools, everybody get on hydroxychloroquine. That is the prevention for COVID. One tablet every other week is good enough. And that is what we need to get across to the American people. There’s prevention and there is cure. We don’t have to lock down schools. We don’t have to lockdown our businesses. There’s prevention, and there is cure. So instead of talking about a mask, instead of talking about lockdowns, instead of talking about all these things, put our teachers on hydroxychloroquine.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (26:59)
Put those that are high risk on hydroxychloroquine. Those that want it. If you want to catch COVID, that’s cool, but you should be given the right to take it and be prevented. So that’s the message. All this stuff that we’re putting together, it’s not necessary because hydroxychloroquine has a prevention. Hydroxychloroquine is a prevention for COVID.

Speaker 8: (27:17)
Earlier I heard you say that…

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (27:18)
Hydroxychloroquine.

Speaker 8: (27:21)
… hydroxychloroquine, that that drug was the cure.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (27:22)
Cure, mm-hm (affirmative).

Speaker 8: (27:25)
But you also said measured with zinc and other things.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (27:27)
Yes.

Speaker 8: (27:27)
And you guys also said that previous doctors have used it, but they’ve used it in the wrong dosage. So I keep hearing the drug, but then what is the right dosage. What is the right mixture?

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (27:39)
That you’re going to discuss with your doctor, but let [inaudible 00:03:43] take that.

Speaker 9: (27:45)
Yeah, that’s a great question. Because the whole political situation has driven the fear towards this drug. So let’s address that. This drug is super safe. It’s safer than aspirin, Motrin, Tylenol. It’s super safe. All right. So what the problem is in a lot of those studies, they did very, very high doses, massive doses all through the country. They did the remaps study, the solidarity trial. That was the world health organization trial, and also the recovery trial. They use 2,400 milligrams in the first day. All you need is 200 twice a week for prophylaxis. They used massive toxic doses. And guess what they found out? When you use massive toxic doses, you get toxic results. The drug doesn’t work when you give toxic doses. It’s a very safe drug. It concentrates in the lungs, 200 to 700 times higher in the lungs.

Speaker 9: (28:38)
It’s an amazing drug because in the bloodstream, you’re not going to get high levels, but you get massive levels in the lungs. So you’re going to find yourself, if you prophylax, that as soon as the virus gets there, it’s going to have a hard time getting through because the hydroxychloroquine blocks it from getting in. And then once it gets in, it won’t let the virus actually replicate. Bring in zinc and zinc will mess up the copy machine called the RDRP. So with the combination of drugs, it’s incredibly effective in the early disease. By itself, it’s incredibly effective as a prophylaxis. Does that answer to the question?

Simone Gold: (29:15)
Yeah. I want to emphasize on something that Dr. [inaudible 00:29:20] just said, because I love the question. This is a treatment regimen that’s very simple, and it should be in the hands of the American people. The difficult aspect of this is that at the moment, because of politics, it’s being blocked from doctors prescribing it, and it’s being blocked from pharmacists releasing it. They’ve been empowered to overrule the doctor’s opinion. Why is this not over the counter? As you can get it in much of the world and almost all of Latin America, in Iran, in Indonesia, in Subsaharan Africa, you can just go and buy it yourself. And the dose, my friends is 200 milligrams twice in a week and zinc daily. That’s the dose. I’m in favor of it being over the counter. Give it to the people. Give it to the people.

Moderator: (30:06)
We have two more, who can answer this question and they know this information.

Dr. James Todaro: (30:12)
Hi, Dr. James Todaro [inaudible 00:30:13]. I just want to add a couple of comments to what Dr. Gold was saying. If it seems like there is an orchestrated attack that’s going on against hydroxychloroquine it’s because there is. When have you ever heard of a medication generating this degree of controversy? A 65 year old medication that has been on the World Health Organization’s safe, essential list of medications for years. It’s over the counter in many countries. And what we’re seeing is a lot of misinformation. So I coauthored the first document on hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for coronavirus. This is back in March and that kind of kicked off a whole series of a storm on it. And since then, there’s been a tremendous amount of censorship on doctors like us and what we’re saying. And a number of us have already been censored. That Google document that I coauthored was actually pulled down by Google. And this is after now, many studies have shown that it is effective and it is safe. You still can’t read that article. And there’s also this misinformation out there. And unfortunately, this has reached the highest orders of medicine. In May there was an article published in The Lancet. This is one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals in the world. The World Health Organization stopped all their clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine because of this study. And it was independent researchers like us who care about patients, who care about the truth that dug into this study and determined that it was actually fabricated data. The data was not real. And we did this so convincingly that this study was retracted by The Lancet less than two weeks after it was published. This is almost unheard of, especially for study of this magnitude.

Dr. James Todaro: (31:44)
So I apologize to everyone for the fact that there is so much misinformation out there, and it’s so hard to find the truth. And unfortunately, it’s going to take looking at other places for the truth. That’s why we formed frontline doctors here to try to help get the real information out there.

Speaker 10: (32:00)
What did you say your name was?

Dr. James Todaro: (32:01)
I’m James Todaro.

Moderator: (32:02)
Give your website.

Dr. James Todaro: (32:05)
Most of my thoughts, I actually publish on Twitter. Twitter has been great lately. So, James Todaro, M D. T-O-D-A-R-O M-D but I also have a website medicineuncensored.com, which contains kind of a lot of the information about hydroxychloroquine I think is much more objective than what’s going on in other media channels.

Speaker 10: (32:28)
One point, in terms of Twitter. That’s important because as I understand not only from doctors, but from other people in the media, that YouTube has blocked information specifically about hydroxychloroquine.

Dr. James Todaro: (32:42)
I’ll go ahead and address that real quickly. I would say Facebook and YouTube have taken the most draconian measures to silence and censorship people. And this is coming from the CEO of YouTube, as well as Mark Zuckerberg saying anything that goes against what the World Health Organization has said is subject to censorship. And we all know the World Health Organization has made a number of mistakes during this pandemic. They have not been perfect by any means. Twitter, although they have some flaws and faults and flag certain content and stuff, they really still remain one of the freest platforms to share dialogue, intelligent discussion regarding this information. And many of us here today actually connected on social platform mediums like that.

Speaker 11: (33:21)
Could you talk about what you mentioned earlier about the medication and how long it’s been around?

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (33:27)
Sure thing. I’m Dr. Joe. Ladapo. I’m a physician at UCLA and I’m a clinical researcher also. And I’m speaking for myself and not on behalf of UCLA. So I want to say that I’m thinking of the people who are behind the screens that are watching what you guys were broadcasting. And I want to share with you because there’s so much controversy and the atmosphere is so full of conflict right now that what this group of doctors is trying to do fundamentally, is really to bring more light to this conversation about how we manage COVID-19 and the huge challenge. And that’s what this is ultimately about. And bringing light to something means thinking more about trade offs, about one of my colleagues said on unintended consequences. And I actually think that’s not even the right word, the right word is unanticipated consequences. Really thinking about the implications of the decisions we’re making in this really, really extraordinary time that we’re in.

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (34:45)
So, I’m sure people are listening to some of the discussion about hydroxychloroquine and wondering, what are these doctors talking about? And, these are doctors that take care of patients, board certified, med school, great med schools, all of that. How could they possibly be saying this? I watch CNN and NBC, and they don’t say anything about this. And that’s actually, that’s the point. There are issues that are moral issues, that really there should be a singular voice. So for me, issues related to whether people are treated differently based on their sex or race, or their sexual orientation. I personally think those are moral issues and there’s only one position on those. But COVID-19 is not a moral issue. COVID-19 is a challenging, complex issue that we benefit from having multiple perspectives on. So it’s not good for the American people when everyone is hearing one perspective on the main stations. There’s no way that’s going to service. So, the perspective most people have been hearing is that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work. That’s the perspective that most people have been hearing on the mainstream television.

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (36:03)
That’s the perspective that most people have been hearing on the mainstream television, and I believe that perspective too, until I started talking to doctors who would look more closely than some of the physicians behind me here, who would look more closely at the data and at the studies.

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (36:17)
So it is a fact that several randomized trials have come out so far, that’s our highest level of evidence, and have shown that hydroxychloroquine… Their findings have generally been that there’s no significant effect on health benefit. So, that’s a fact, that the randomized control trials have come out… So far that have come out. In fact, there were two or three big ones that came out over the last two weeks, [inaudible 00:36:44] Internal Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, and I think one other journal.

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (36:49)
It is also a fact that there have been several observational studies. These are just not randomized controlled trials, but patients who are getting treated with this medication that have found that hydroxychloroquine improves outcomes. So both of those things are true. There’s evidence against it and there’s evidence for it. It is also a fact that we are in an extraordinarily challenging time. Given those considerations, how can the right answer be to limit physician’s use of the medication? That can’t possibly be the right answer. And when you consider that this medication before COVID-19 had been used for decades, by patients with rheumatoid arthritis, by patients with lupus, by patients with other conditions, by patients who were traveling to West Africa and needed malaria prophylaxis, we’ve been using it for a long time, but all of a sudden it’s elevated to this area of looking like some poisonous drug. That just doesn’t make sense.

Dr. Joe Ladapo: (37:59)
Then when you add onto that the fact that we’ve had two of the biggest journals in the world, New England Journal of Medicine, and Lancet, as my colleagues say, retract studies that found, interestingly, that hydroxychloroquine harmed patients. Both of these studies. They had to retract these studies, which really is unheard of. That should raise everyone’s concern about what is going on. At the very least, we can live in a world where there are differences of opinion about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, but still allow more data to come, still allow physicians who feel like they have expertise with it use that medication, and still talk, and learn, and get better at helping people with COVID-19. Dr. Joe Ladapo: (38:50) So why we’re not there is not good. It doesn’t make sense, and we need to get out of there.

Dr. Stella Immanuel: (38:58)
Listen, let me just put a little bit of that. I have seen 350 patients and counting. Put them on hydroxychloroquine. They all got better. This is what I would say to all those studies, they had high doses, they were given to wrong patients. I will call them fake science. Any study that says hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work, is fake science and I want them to show me how it doesn’t work. How is it going to work for 350 patients for me and they’re all alive, and then somebody say it doesn’t work? Guys, all them studies, fake science.

Simone Gold: (39:30)
What was your question? Thank you.

Speaker 14: (39:31)
Last question.

Simone Gold: (39:31)
Yeah, last question.

Speaker 13: (39:35)
I’ve heard there’s an increase in anxiety, suicidal ideation, substance abuse, and various mental health issues as a result of school closures and shutdowns. Is it your recommendation that [inaudible 00:39:48] federal funding for programs will help deal with those issues?

Simone Gold: (39:54)
Yeah, I don’t understand how you would go to that conclusion. If the problem was that the schools are shut down, and it’s causing it, then we need to open up the schools.

Speaker 14: (40:03)
[inaudible 00:40:03] mental healthcare [crosstalk 00:40:05].

Simone Gold: (40:06)
Yeah. I would go to the school. I would open up the schools, because the most important thing for children is to socialize, and to be with other kids, and to learn. Yeah. [crosstalk 00:40:14] Yeah. Let’s get kids back in school.

Speaker 14: (40:17) You don’t believe that?

Simone Gold: (40:20)
Kids back in school. We’re in favor of kids back in school.

Speaker 15: (40:22)
Thank you everyone. [crosstalk 00:04:24]. Thank you very much. And we are going to be going back live continuing our summit, so you can continue watching. Once we get back, we may be running.

Speaker 16: (40:35)
Thank you so much. [inaudible 00:40:45]. Dr. Stella Immanuel: (40:38) It’s fake science. [crosstalk 00:04:50]. It’s fake science.

Simone Gold: (40:50)
That’s right. I believe you. I believe you. [crosstalk 00:40:52].

Doctor 1: (40:54)
It’s more specialized, so I have to defer.

Speaker 18: (40:55) You said that depression-

Doctor 1: (40:56)
That depression is caused by low zinc levels. When you go into a hospital nowadays, they don’t test for those zinc levels. Low zinc levels are manifested by loss of sense of smell, loss of taste. Why are these also symptoms of COVID, right? COVID, loss of sense of smell, loss of taste, right? And the reason is because zinc is the natural thing that used to fight the COVID. What happens is the zinc stops RNA polymerase, and the hydroxy chloroquine allows the zinc to go into the cells.

Speaker 18: (41:33)
I’m wondering- To stop the RNA polymerase-

Speaker 18: (41:35)
Because there was a-

Doctor 1: (41:36) Hang on, hang on. It was implied that- Let me give you the science behind it. So if your lab is [crosstalk 00:41:41]… I understand.

Speaker 18: (41:43)
Yeah.

Doctor 1: (41:43)
Let me explain it a little bit better. The zinc stops RNA polymerase, and it’s used up by your cells in the normal fighting of COVID. So if you never took hydroxychloroquine, you’d still be zinc depleted. We’re in a natural state of zinc depletion in the United States, but the COVID decreases your zinc even more, and you need it to fight off any virus. That’s why your mom always said, “Take your zinc,” right?

Speaker 18: (42:04)
Is the problem with children on psych units that they have low zinc levels?

Doctor 1: (42:11)
No, no, no. We’re talking about the COVID and how that… [inaudible 00:06:13]. Okay. My question was about if federal funds should be diverted to helping therapists, social workers and other frontline workers to deal with the psychological issues that were mentioned by your colleague, that shut downs in the government and school closures cause an increase in suicidal ideation, and substance abuse, and anxiety. So those environmental factors are what caused those mental health issues. Doesn’t it stand to reason that then funds to help those institutions deal with the problem should be receiving more funding?

Doctor 1: (42:47)
I’m going to defer to my psychiatrist colleague.

Speaker 18: (42:50)
He didn’t hear me ask the question. [crosstalk 00:42:51].

Doctor 1: (42:51)
First, we need to take care of the biological basis, which is the zinc, which is the vitamin D, lack of vitamin D. We’re dumping our milk.

Speaker 18: (43:03)
Yeah, I don’t know about that.

Doctor 1: (43:04)
We’re dumping our milk [crosstalk 00:07:05]. We’re dumping our milk in the manure pits right now. If we would get together-

Doctor 2: (43:09)
Yeah, that’s hard to believe.

Doctor 1: (43:10)
If we would get that to the kids out of school, that will be very helpful.

Speaker 18: (43:14)
Okay.

Doctor 1: (43:14)
So I’ll defer to my colleague.

Speaker 18: (43:17)
So my question, I still haven’t gotten a clear answer on it- Doctor 2: (43:19) I’ll try to answer. Public policy is not my expertise, but I can try.

Speaker 18: (43:23)
Oh no, it’s not really about… It’s not my expertise either, actually. But I was wondering since your colleague said that as a result of school closures and government shutdowns, which caused an increase in suicidal ideation, anxiety, substance abuse, and a variety of other issues, I’m wondering if federal funding should be diverted to frontline workers, social workers, mental health therapists?

Doctor 2: (43:45)
The answer your question is this, I see it this way, harm has already come is what we’re saying. So the answer to the question is, harm has already come. What should we do about that harm? I don’t know the inner workings of the government, but to say that harm has already come, and to say that we’re going to do something about it, it makes sense. To me as a doctor, I think if we know harm is coming, if you and I know we already got run over by a car, I think it makes sense to let me go ahead and go to the hospital to get my-

Speaker 18: (44:10)
There’s a real lack of funding for people in my profession to be able to help those kids and those adults.

Doctor 2: (44:12)
Yeah, I think it makes a lot of sense. So I’m going to just say, to me, it makes sense, and I think it’s fair.

Speaker 18: (44:20)
I appreciate the well-rounded concern. It just kind of stops with concern and it doesn’t continue into action. Congress might not, I’m not sure who he was, maybe you could actually give [crosstalk 00:08:31].



「ヒドロキシクロロキン」がコロナに有効であると認めた2005年の記事。

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

Abstract

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.

Results

We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an emerging disease that was first reported in Guangdong Province, China, in late 2002. The disease rapidly spread to at least 30 countries within months of its first appearance, and concerted worldwide efforts led to the identification of the etiological agent as SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), a novel member of the family Coronaviridae [1]. Complete genome sequencing of SARS-CoV [23] confirmed that this pathogen is not closely related to any of the previously established coronavirus groups. Budding of the SARS-CoV occurs in the Golgi apparatus [4] and results in the incorporation of the envelope spike glycoprotein into the virion. The spike glycoprotein is a type I membrane protein that facilitates viral attachment to the cellular receptor and initiation of infection, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) has been identified as a functional cellular receptor of SARS-CoV [5]. We have recently shown that the processing of the spike protein was effected by furin-like convertases and that inhibition of this cleavage by a specific inhibitor abrogated cytopathicity and significantly reduced the virus titer of SARS-CoV [6].

Due to the severity of SARS-CoV infection, the potential for rapid spread of the disease, and the absence of proven effective and safe in vivo inhibitors of the virus, it is important to identify drugs that can effectively be used to treat or prevent potential SARS-CoV infections. Many novel therapeutic approaches have been evaluated in laboratory studies of SARS-CoV: notable among these approaches are those using siRNA [7], passive antibody transfer [8], DNA vaccination [9], vaccinia or parainfluenza virus expressing the spike protein [1011], interferons [1213], and monoclonal antibody to the S1-subunit of the spike glycoprotein that blocks receptor binding [14]. In this report, we describe the identification of chloroquine as an effective pre- and post-infection antiviral agent for SARS-CoV. Chloroquine, a 9-aminoquinoline that was identified in 1934, is a weak base that increases the pH of acidic vesicles. When added extracellularly, the non-protonated portion of chloroquine enters the cell, where it becomes protonated and concentrated in acidic, low-pH organelles, such as endosomes, Golgi vesicles, and lysosomes. Chloroquine can affect virus infection in many ways, and the antiviral effect depends in part on the extent to which the virus utilizes endosomes for entry. Chloroquine has been widely used to treat human diseases, such as malaria, amoebiosis, HIV, and autoimmune diseases, without significant detrimental side effects [15]. Together with data presented here, showing virus inhibition in cell culture by chloroquine doses compatible with patient treatment, these features suggest that further evaluation of chloroquine in animal models of SARS-CoV infection would be warranted as we progress toward finding effective antivirals for prevention or treatment of the disease.

↑このページのトップヘ